Comments on: Basic Fighter Maneuvers (BFM) and How They Relate To Information Security http://www.andrewhay.ca/archives/57 the website of a devastatingly handsome author, sporadic blogger, bbq junkie, and security strong man Mon, 09 Aug 2010 03:23:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: ahay http://www.andrewhay.ca/archives/57/comment-page-1#comment-1039 ahay Thu, 09 Nov 2006 22:27:24 +0000 http://www.andrewhay.ca/archives/57#comment-1039 Take a read of the full story here: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/case_dogfight/clues.html It's quite interesting. Take a read of the full story here: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/case_dogfight/clues.html

It’s quite interesting.

]]> By: LonerVamp http://www.andrewhay.ca/archives/57/comment-page-1#comment-1035 LonerVamp Thu, 09 Nov 2006 15:28:15 +0000 http://www.andrewhay.ca/archives/57#comment-1035 Ok, I have two comments. First, what happened between Pug and Sakai??? Did he just demonstrate that he had Sakai, Sakai realized this, and the encounter ended? :) I'd look it up, but I'm at work, hehe. Second, I like the parallels in defensive/neutral/offensive approaches. I wonder if it would be possible to adjust this to the ever-changing way a dogfight changes. For instance, in an offensive position, your IT staff has its nose pointed at the attackers while the attackers work to change that situation... Actually, as I think about it, I'm just further complicating your analogy, so I'll shut up now and just leave that thought. :) Ok, I have two comments. First, what happened between Pug and Sakai??? Did he just demonstrate that he had Sakai, Sakai realized this, and the encounter ended? :) I’d look it up, but I’m at work, hehe.

Second, I like the parallels in defensive/neutral/offensive approaches. I wonder if it would be possible to adjust this to the ever-changing way a dogfight changes. For instance, in an offensive position, your IT staff has its nose pointed at the attackers while the attackers work to change that situation…

Actually, as I think about it, I’m just further complicating your analogy, so I’ll shut up now and just leave that thought. :)

]]>